Four Roles for Collaborative Leadership
Traditional Management Advice is Pretty Consistent
People have been thinking about leadership for basically all of human history. We all grow up with examples of leadership in our homes, schools, and communities that imprint images in our minds. For the last several decades academics, business school professors and the training industrial complex have been churning out lots of leadership models and management advice…. So we have all of that swirling around in there too.
From Frederick Taylor, to John Kotter, to probably your high school principal, a lot of the mainstream traditional idea of leadership boils down to this:
The traditional leader is:
The decider, who knows what to do
The persuader who convinces everyone to do it
The director who tells them how to do it
And the enforcer, who makes sure they do it
If we’re honest, that’s the narrative a lot of have deep in our head about corporate leadership: The leader sees the problem that others don’t. They set the strategy. They create buy-in and alignment. There are sure to be project plans and timelines. The leader makes sure everybody knows exactly what they are supposed to do. They remind everybody repeatedly to do it and they have a dashboard of key indicators to see if it’s being done.
Except It Often Doesn’t Work
There are times where traditional leadership works, but it is actually quite limited. Organizations have had access to classic management advice for decades. So, they’ve racked up lots of practice with traditional management techniques. But the stats on the failure rates of corporate leadership are still pretty bad.
Depending who you ask and how you ask it, somewhere in the neighborhood of 70% of major initiatives don’t meet their goals. By some recent indicators, that number is only getting worse. Think about your own organization; how many stalled or failed initiatives have you witnessed or even been part of? If our traditional ideas about leadership are right, then why don’t they work all the time?
The World Has Changed
For one thing, we’re not living in the industrial revolution anymore. In today’s world, complexity is high:
You can’t know everything
You can’t plan everything
You can’t predict everything
That means no single leader can possibly see all the issues and dictate everything that needs to be done.
Plus, formal authority is limited in most organizations today. In the old days, a manager might have had direct control over everything they needed to deliver on their goals. It’s rarely that way anymore.
You rely on people who don’t report to you
You use processes that you don’t own
You need resources that aren’t in your budget
Even people who do report to you don’t always do what you ask of them
The Challenges Have Changed
If you go back and really look at that classic management stuff, you’ll see there are some key assumptions that are subtly baked into most of it, about the kinds of work people are taking on:
Defined Initiatives: Challenges are generally presented as a defined initiative. It may be complex, but ultimately there is some particular thing or limited set of things that need to get done.
Known Solutions: It’s generally assumed that the right thing to do is known, or at least knowable, in advance. We may have some questions to answer and options to choose from, but we can get to a right answer with a little work.
Steady State A to B: The assumption is usually that we’re moving from one stable situation, through a relatively brief transition, and arriving at a new stable state of affairs.
Top-Down: In the classic view, leadership is usually something that the leader does to or for people below. There’s a lot of time spent on things like driving alignment down through the organization or creating “followership.”
Process, Structure, System: Classic management advice assumes the leader needs to focus much of their time on altering organizational processes, structures, and systems.
Now think about the biggest challenges facing your business today.
Do they fit that set of classic assumptions?
Does any single person have all the answers?
Is traditional leadership going to be enough?
You’re Facing Big Challenges
When we look at the biggest problems and opportunities of most companies today, the old assumptions don't really fit:
Broad Scope: Rather than a simple defined initiative, we’re talking about issues with broad and ambiguous implications for the business.
Uncertain Challenges: We don’t have established solutions to pick from. In fact, we don’t even have a complete handle on the problem yet.
Continuous Waves: Nor do we have the luxury of those long steady-states punctuated by short periods of change. Conditions keep evolving at a rate where we have to move from one challenge to the next. If we get a brief breather now and then, we consider ourselves lucky.
Multi-Directional: Increasingly, we are responding to forces outside the organization, and our response to those challenges is being sparked by people at various levels and in unexpected places inside the organization.
People and Culture: Of course, we need new processes and systems from time to time, but the bigger challenge is how we are going to develop our people and evolve our culture to the place we need them to be.